Migrating your Team Over to Pylon
Last updated: August 15, 2025
There are a couple of different options available for cutting your team over to Pylon that we will outline here. There are dependencies based on what system you are migrating off of, as well as the various channels that you ingest customer tickets from (eg. Slack, Email, Chat Widget, etc.) that will make certain options impossible (or very hard).
Things to Consider
Disruption to your Support Agents
Disruption to customers
Complexity of migration
Immediate Cutover to Pylon
This will always be the option that we push our customers towards. As soon as the team is ready, the Migrations team will kick off the historical data import and you will cut over all channels (email, chat widget, etc) so that all new issues go into Pylon. This sequencing is important so that once the data migration is kicked off, no new issues only flow into your old system.
While we support and recommend immediate cutover to all customers, however how "seamless" this cutover is for your customers will depend on what system you use, and how what channel is in place.
Pros
Cleanest way to cutover. There is limited time between the cutover and the data migration.
You can answer all your open tickets in Pylon - You will also the whole thread in Pylon.
Cons
If you are using email and "seamless" cutover is not an option (eg. not using Zendesk, Front, or Intercom), you will have to close out all open tickets and ask customers to re-open them in Pylon.
Duration Cutover to Pylon
Allow for 1 week to 1 month for ongoing old system tickets to close before telling customers to move. Recommend if you have long time to resolutions, you want minimal disruption to your customers, and/or large teams.
Note: not all support systems can handle a Duration Cutover depending on how the old system implements email.
Pros
Minimal disruption to your customers. For most of your customers, the cutover will be seamless and they won't experience any change.
Cons
Disruption to your team. Your team will need to juggle two support systems.
Slowest (1 week - 1 month). This can delay shutting off your old system for an extra month.
If you use Customer Portal, there's a large gap in customer ticket visibility for the duration of the cutover.
Work out of both systems
Work out of both systems (Pylon and the old system) until your team is ready. Recommended if you have low ticket volume and/or small (< 5 person) teams.
Pros
Fast (few days). You hook up email, test and iterate, and shut the old system down after a few days.
Easiest upfront and least amount of work. You're essentially trading off ease of getting started with a data mess afterward.
Run both systems in parallel. Note though, If you're looking to test in parallel, we recommend to use a test email or migrate an unimportant email instead.
Cons
Confusion for your team and customers. We can't pick up replies from your old system so issues in Pylon will be lossy and vice versa. This is fine with a small team or low volume since you can more easily manually keep track of tickets.
Bad data hygiene. Upon data migration, emails created in the overlap will be duplicated.
Dropped tickets after switching. When your team moves over, ongoing old system tickets will be dropped.